Answer:
look for an alternative route
Explanation:
Read the quote and select the correct answer.
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress
may from time to time ordain and establish.
-US Constitution Article III, Section
Answer:B
Explanation:See FISA Court
It's a secret Court for investigation of information technology that it is secret is counter to public good because it takes all transparency out of the dealings of our elected officials and strips the judicial of any oversite which is the intended function of the checks and balances system set up by the constitution. Our judicial review power has been systemically legislated to have no teeth. Because of the corrupt corporations and the bought politicians who care only for money and power instead of their constituents or the United States, our precious constitution is now a meaningless hollow document. So sad
1. If your vehicle breaks down while moving, pull off the road as far as
ten feet
the shoulder
the ditch
possible
You have been asked to draft a document related to evidence-gathering that contains details about personnel in possession and control of evidence from the time of discovery up through the time of presentation in court. Which type of document is this
Which action can lead to intentional injuries?
A. Falling from a ladder at home
B. Getting in a car crash
C. Tripping on the stairs
D. Getting in a fight
hey I'm trying to reachout for someone and that person knows who it is and if you see this message please, comment below and my question is Misdemeanors do not include any violent crimes or crimes with the potential to harm others.
Is the previous statement true or false?
Answer:
Your answer is False
Explanation:
mark Me brainliest if my answer Is correct
A motorcyclist, a car driver, and a truck driver were involved in a three-vehicle accident in a busy intersection. The motorcyclist filed a negligence action against the car driver for personal injuries suffered in the accident. In the car driver's pleadings, she denied that she was negligent and raised the motorcyclist's contributory negligence as a defense. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of the car driver. The motorcyclist then filed a negligence action against the truck driver. At the appropriate time, the truck driver filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, asserting that the motorcyclist was precluded from re-litigating his contributory negligence. Is the truck driver likely to be successful
Answer:
No the truck driver is not likely to be successful.
Explanation:
Because in every accident bigger vehicle is the one who is responsible for the accidents. Because he has bigger vehicel so he should drive slowly in his lane. Because his brakes are not so good to stop at the right point.
Answer:
45 and 60
Explanation:
write any five advantage of good company for disadvantage of bad company ?
Explanation:
Bad company does not have a trustworthy feeling for his/her relationships. They want to do things in their own ways. They don't respect other people's emotions and opinions. They always wish to get things using unfair ways.Advantages of a company include that: liability for shareholders is limited. it's easy to transfer ownership by selling shares to another party. shareholders (often family members) can be employed by the company.
What are star made of?
Who is the current prime minister of Nepal?
What is Lawyer?
Answer:
1) stars are made of hydrogen and helium that produce light and heat from the churning nuclear forges inside their cores
2) the current prime minister of Nepal is Sher Bahadur Deuba
3) A lawyer is a person who practices or studies law; an attorney or a counselor.
Hope this helps you, if it does plz mark me as BrainliestThx, Have a wonderful day!! :)When he turned 21, a young man who lived in State A decided to move to a city in State B. He loaded all his possessions in his truck and trailer and set out for State B. While en route, he was involved in a serious accident in State C with a woman driving an SUV, injuring both parties. Because of his injuries, the man has remained in State C for several months. However, he still intends to relocate to the city in State B as soon as he has recuperated and is able to travel. The woman, a citizen and resident of State D, is preparing to file a negligence action in federal district court against the man for the injuries she suffered in the State C accident. If the woman files the action before the man proceeds to State B, in what federal district or districts is venue proper
Answer: The District of State C and the District of State A.
Explanation:
The federal district or districts whereby the venue is proper is the District of State C and the District of State A. It should be noted that the federal venue in a civil action will be proper in the district whereby part of the events brought about the claim that occurred.
In this case, the proper venue is the District of State C as a substantial part of the events brought about the claim that occurred there. Also, during the time that the accident took place, the domicile of the man was in State A.
Case law comes from court rulings.
True or false
Answer:
false
Explanation:
it only makes sense
Why is the labor force participation rate important to an economy? How has the labor force
participation rate changed over time in the US? What are some major economic and
demographic trends that have affected it?
Explanation:
After trending up for more than three decades, the labor force participation rate peaked at 67.3 percent in early 2000. Over the next few years, the rate receded to about 66 percent and stayed at that level through 2008. The participation rate then dropped again, and by mid-2016, it stood at 62.7 percent.
While in a department store, a man picked up a sweater and slipped it under his shirt. The man then started for the door. A woman, who also was shopping in the store, saw the man take the sweater. The woman grabbed a baseball bat from the sporting goods aisle and chased the man into the parking lot. The woman began swinging the bat at the man's head, hoping to knock him out and thus prevent the theft. The man pulled a knife from his pocket and stabbed the woman, killing her. The man was arrested and charged with murder. At trial, will the man most likely be found guilty
Answer:
D). No, because the man was acting in self-defense.
Explanation:
In the given situation, the man would not be considered guilty of murdering the woman and this is because the action took place when was defending himself from the attacks made by that woman on him. However, the man was attempting to steal the sweater at the store yet the deadly attack made by the woman on his head with the baseball bat cannot be justified in any case. Her act would be categorized under 'dangerous felony' and therefore, the use of a knife by the man was enforced on him to save himself. Hence, the action was in 'self-defense' and he will not be punished for it as it was the woman who initiated the physical violence and harm and he just reacted. Thus, option D is the correct answer.
A homeowner filed a federal diversity action against the manufacturer of a pressure cooker for a products liability action based on state law, alleging that she was severely burned because the top flew off the pressure cooker during operation. Under the state law, a jury verdict does not have to be unanimous. However, a specific rule under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure directly conflicts with the state law and provides that jury verdicts in federal court must be unanimous. Which statement correctly presents what law the federal judge should apply regarding the jury verdict
Answer:
The federal rule must apply in this case.
Explanation:
A federal court must, in fact, apply to state law when it has a case that was initiated under state law. However, when this case is also based on diversity of citizenship, a federal statute, or a federal rule, as shown in the case above, the court must apply the federal rule, provided that procedural rule does not interfere or deny any right, as shown in the case of the question above. Therefore, the court must apply federal rule.
True or false? Shooting a vicious animal is permitted in self-defense.
What is the difference between conservative and Liberal Supreme Court Justices?
Each Justice of the United States Supreme Court has four law clerks. Law clerks are recent law school graduates who serve for one year as a legal assistant to a Supreme Court Justice. Law clerks are very important to the work of the Court. In each chamber, the Justice and the four clerks form a close-knit intellectual family. It is with their law clerks that Justices are able to speak openly and to engage in a candid give-and-take, testing ideas, theories and approaches as they consider the merits of each case. Moreover, in most chambers the law clerks play a central role in preparing drafts of a Justice's opinions.
A plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused by the defendant. The plaintiff sued the defendant for his injuries. In preparation for trial, the plaintiff's attorney hired a doctor to examine the plaintiff. At trial, the defense attorney attempts to call the doctor as a witness to testify about statements the plaintiff made in confidence to the doctor about his injuries, which the doctor then communicated to the plaintiff's attorney. The state recognizes only the common law privileges. Should this testimony be admitted
Answer:
Yes! The Courtroom is the only place where the "Doctor/Patient Confidentiality" does not uphold.
If it is it the state who is targeting a group of people, what recourse do they have to achieve justice?
Answer:
Going to the supreme court.
Explanation:
If the state who is targeting a group of people, they have to achieve justice by going to the high court first or supreme court because supreme court has the authority to resolve disputes between two groups on the basis of justice. The supreme court has the authority to stop the state from targeting the specific group of people so the people has the option to go to the court for achieving justice.
Are twelve jurors enough to provide an adequate and fair representation of society for the purpose of determining an accused person's guilt or innocence beyond a reasonable doubt? Explain why or why not. Include examples.
Answer:
yes, because of the wisdom of the crowd
Explanation:
crowdsourcing is an example
wikipedia: "Trial by jury can be understood as at least partly relying on wisdom of the crowd, compared to bench trial which relies on one or a few experts"
sweet number is around 11 (npr)
wikipedia: it's done by sometimes "taking the average over a large number of responses"
examples : Congress, supreme court, board of directors
The term "uppers" refers to .
A. depressants
B. stimulants.
C. sedatives.
Answer:
C. sedative
Explanation:
This is also referring to something above
The table below lists sources of law.
Sources of Law
Statutes and Acts
Ordinance
?
Which phrase completes the table?
Criminal law
Case law
Military law
Juvenile law
Answer:
military law
Explanation:
tell me I'm right
Verify that –(-x) is the same as x , for x = −4/5
Answer:
-4/5
Explanation:
it came be two possible answer for x
Explanation:
???
-(-x) = -1×(-1×x) = -1×(-1×-4/5) = -1×(4/5) = -4/5
therefore, yes, -(-x) = x
Article VII of the constitution describeds?
Answer:
how the U.S Constitution would be ratified.
Explanation:
A constitution refers to a set of written laws and principles which is typically used to determine the power and authority of the government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights of its citizens.
Hence, the Constitution is a formally written document that contains the set of laws that we live by in the United States of America. It guarantees certain rights to the federal government and the states such as right to taxation, regulate interstate commerce, declare war, borrow money, provide for the military forces, etc.
Basically, the Constitution accords powers to the national or federal government and these includes; enumerated or delegated, reflected, and concurrent powers.
Article VII is an article of the US Constitution and it is referred to as special state ratifying convention. Thus, it describes the ratification process for the Constitution of the United States of America by establishing that the Constitution shall be enacted by the U.S Congress to become the official law of the ratifying states when it's ratified by nine (9) states among the thirteen (13) states.
On the 7th of December, 1787, Delaware became the first state to ratify the U.S Constitution while New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify it, doing so on the 21st of June, 1788.
In conclusion, Article VII of the Constitution of the United States of America describes how the Constitution would be ratified by the states.
This road sign means:
1: The road ahead turns sharply right then sharply left
2: Winding road ahead
3: A road joins from the left.
4: Sharp right turn
Answer:
4 sharp right turn
hope this helps
have a good day or night
The given road signs depicts Sharp right turn. So option D is correct among all given options.
What is road signs?Road signs, often known as traffic signs, are posted along the side of roadways or above them to inform and direct drivers. Simple wooden or stone milestones were the oldest types of signs. Later, directional signs with arms were developed, such as the fingerposts used in the United Kingdom and their wooden equivalents in Saxony.
Since the 1930s, as traffic volumes have increased, many nations have adopted pictorial signs or have similarly standardized and simplified their signs in an effort to overcome linguistic barriers and improve traffic safety.
Such pictorial signals are typically based on international norms and use symbols (often silhouettes) in place of words. These road signs were initially created in Europe and have since been adopted in varied degrees by the majority of nations.
Thus International agreements like the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals have aided in bringing traffic signs in different nations closer together. To minimize confusion, some nations have also (in part) unilaterally adopted policies from other nations.
Learn more about road sign:
https://brainly.com/question/28089398
#SPJ2
Only ____ can reduce blood alcohol content (BAC) and alcohol's effects on the body.
A patient properly filed a medical malpractice claim against a doctor in federal district court. The complaint simply asserted negligence as the grounds for relief without any facts supporting the claim. The doctor filed a pretrial motion for a more definite statement, which the court denied. Immediately thereafter, and without submitting an answer, the doctor filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. Will the court grant this motion to dismiss
Answer:
No. The Plaintiff should re-file with more substantiating evidence.
cho ví dụ về truyền thống dựng nước đi đôi vs giữ nc của tổ tiên
Answer:
bonjour a toi désolé je ne peux pas maintenir
Explanation:
pa cerveau moins
1. What is Ms. Roman’s employment background?
Ms. Roman's employment background is that she's been a police officer for 25 years.
2. What statistics from police academies in the state of New Jersey were alarming to Ms. Roman?
The statistics from the police academies in the state of New Jersey that were alarming to Ms. Roman are the rates between 65 and 80 percent of women are failing due to the physical fitness test.
3. What was a major reason for women failing at the police academies?
A major reason for women failing at the police academies are recruits needing to pass the fitness exam within 10 short workouts and only have three weeks to try to pass due to a new policy.
4. What had these police recruits been required to do in order to reach the point in the process that allowed them to take the physical fitness test?
Police recruits were required to pass very lengthy background checks, medical exams, psychological exams, and clearly quit any other job.
5. What data does Ms. Roman share about women serving as police officers? What data does she share about women working as police chiefs?
The data Ms. Roman shares about women serving as police officers is that less than 13% of the police officers hadn't changed much in the past 20 years. Only 3% of women were police chiefs in 2013.
6. How are other countries doing when it comes to female representation in the police force compared to the US?
When female representation in the police force compares to the US some countries have nearly twice as many women police officers.
7. According to research, what are some positive results to having female police officers on the force?
Positive results to having female police officers on the force include female police officers tending to have more of a positive influence, great job performance, trustworthiness, and fairness in the police force.
8. What does Ms. Roman define as the main problem with the different policy agencies and their standards?
Ms. Roman defines that the main problem in different policy agencies and their standards is that the the differing policy agencies and their standards is that the main focus is on physical strength.
9. What should police academies also focus on, aside from physical strength, when recruiting officers?
Other than physical strength police academies should focus on problem-solving skills, community policing, and interpersonal communication skills.
10. What are some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force? How must the testing process be changed to ensure women are not unfairly excluded from the force?
Some ways to encourage more female recruits to join the police force could be good salary package and suitable environments. When it comes to good salaries for the police force and an environment that feels safe and suitable with lack of sexual harassments then more women will join, some just cause they want to not for the "encouragement". The testing process could be conducted under fair supervision in order to ensure that women are not being unfairly justed from the force.
Workers should not get involved in policy decisions about his/her rights because the government is the one making those decisions.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
In terms of workers' rights and responsibilities, an employee is given the right to be a part of the decision-making process. This does not mean that every worker has to be a member of the policy-making committee but that he/she can participate in the process through different means.
Pertaining to one's rights, everyone has the right to express his/her opinions as it refers to the person(s)'s individual right. And whatever decision that's been taken or made will affect him/her. So, it is important that workers should get involved in the policy decisions about his/her rights. The government does not have the right to directly impose any decisions about the workers without consulting them.
Thus, the statement is false.
Which situation always warrants calling 911 when someone is injured?
A. Moving the person may cause injury
B. A bone could be broken
C. The hospital is more than 10 miles away
D. You are alone with the injured person
Answer:
A
Explanation:
how do Christians play the role of John the Baptist
Answer:
Just a cousin of Jesus who is a few months older,he spend his time baptizing then he baptized his cousin and then there was a dove who spoke on behalf of God.he died because some king was trying ......his head cut off.
Explanation:
Sorry just watch videos on You tube about his life
