Answer:
In a common law jurisdiction, the property that the defendant is guilty of larceny is the lawnmower.
Explanation:
Larceny or theft is the intentional possession of someone's property for the purpose of permanently depriving the owner of its use. The property may be the person's identity, intellectual property, services, and personal property. Though the automobile was totally ruined, the neighbor did not initially intend to dispossess the owner of the car. But he intended to dispossess the owner of the lawnmower since he was about to trade it in for a new one, which will belong to him and not the former owner.
list two items you can do to keep a DWI off your record!
Under the Texas penal code one definition of “intoxicated” involves not having the normal use of ones mental or physical abilities as a result of consuming ?
Answer:
Alcohol
Explanation:
taking alcohol makes some changes in ones behavior
Discuss the claim that foreign policy and domestic policy are two faces of the same coin. give me full answers.
Answer:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
Explanation:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
ANY COLLEGE STUDENT KNOW HOW EXAMITY WORKS?
Answer:
chill with the caps and uhh no
Explanation:
After a robbery, what is the purpose of conducting a neighborhood canvass?
to look for hiding suspects
to identify and interview witnesses
to check for footprints or tire tracks
to find stolen items
Answer:
b
Explanation:
if it's for the entire neighborhood, it being witnesses would make sense.
Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
I.An agency relationship may be created through necessityII.All agents are entitled to be paid for their servicesIII. An agent may form a relationship between a third party and the principa
Answer:
II
Explanation:
All agent are entitled to be paid for their services
Law Enforcement can issue a DUI for driving under the influence of prescription drugs just as they would for
someone who wad been drinking and driving.
A. True.
B. False.
The statement" Law Enforcement can issue a DUI for driving under the influence of prescription drugs just as they would for someone who wad been drinking and driving" is True.
What is Law Enforcement?Law enforcement is the practice of some members of the government acting in a planned manner to uphold the law by identifying, discouraging, treating or punishing those who disobey the laws and social standards that govern that society.
The phrase refers to the legal system, courts, and prisons. By using record sharing and interdependent collaboration, these three elements can function alone or jointly.
The idea of law enforcement has been around since the dawn of time, and police and law enforcement have taken many different forms in all human communities.
The term "peace officer," or "law enforcement officer," is used in modern state legal codes to refer to every person who the legislating state has invested with police power or authority. Traditionally, law enforcement refers to anyone who is sworn or badged and has the authority to detain anyone for violating the law.
Learn more about Law Enforcement, here
https://brainly.com/question/10253135
#SPJ2
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
Which of the following stages in the criminal trial process winds up the trial proceedings?
opening statement
cross-examination
closing argument
direct examination
Answer:
option c
Explanation:
closing argument
Which of the following crimes is a low-profile crime that typically involves stealing a large amount of money over a long period of time?
burglary
larceny
fraud
embezzlement
Answer:
the answer is embezzlement
What is the purpose of cross-examination during a trial?
O A. To convince the judge to deliver a verdict immediately
B. To summarize each side's arguments to the jury
C. To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious
D. To give the jury a firsthand account of an incident
C. To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious.
Cross-examination is used during a trial to test the witness's credibility and to create doubt.
Answer:
To make witnesses look untrustworthy and suspicious
Explanation:
Which one of the following statements is NOT part of the biochemical point of view?
The biochemical point of view is include viewing a statement from the scientific view point.
What is biochemical point of view?Biochemical view helps to view things or happening in a way to fit that help fill it into life form.
They are scientific view of a particular statement
Therefore, The biochemical point of view is include viewing a statement from the scientific
view point.
Learn more on biochemical below
https://brainly.com/question/3652831
#SPJ2
Drivers Ed confusing question
Answer:
T intersections
Explanation:
The T intersection is representing a 3 way sTop i hope this helps.
Asking yourself whether your mind is currently occupied by things that can take your concentration off the road is something you should do ______.
iebwbehwhjwjshehhee wuwiuehe.hwjwje ...
get your mind to think about other things so your concentrated
Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court lever is called
a/an?
Answer:
Trevor1984. Questioning whether an error of law was made at the trial court level is called an appeal
A person who knowingly causes the death of another while committing a criminal act, but who did not act under the influence of sudden passion, has committed
second degree murder.
involuntary manslaughter.
voluntary manslaughter.
first degree murder.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its C. voluntary manslaughter
senate bill 35 is the zero tolerance law for someone over 21. true or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
California Senate Bill 35 is a statute streamlining housing construction in California counties and cities that fail to build enough housing to meet state mandated housing construction requirements. The bill was introduced to the California State Assembly by State Senator Scott Wiener on December 15, 2016
The way to the house ?
Answer:
what is the house in question
Explanation:
do yo have a screen shot
jails never hold more than 1,000 prisoners
true or false
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. This is despite the national incarceration rate being at its lowest in 20 years. About 25% of the world’s total prison population is in the United States, which holds about 2.19 million prisoners as of 2019 (1.38 million in federal and state prisons, 745,200 in jails).
It false, i got the unit 8 for this question and it false
Explanation:
Need help with drivers Ed questions
Answer:
traditional and non traditional intersections
Explanation:
Ngành nghề nào nhà nước cấm đầu tư.?
Answer:
Ngành, nghề cấm kinh doanh
Các hoạt động liên quan đến mua bán mại dâm. Kinh doanh pháo nổ trừ pháo tín hiệu, pháo thỏa thuận theo quy định của cơ quan nhà nước có thẩm quyền. Mua bán người và các bộ phận của con người. Kinh doanh hoạt động văn hóa nghệ thuật xâm phạm an ninh quốc gia và đạo đức xã hội.
How far should you stop from The nearest railroad crossing if a flagger is warning of a upcoming train
At trial in a criminal prosecution for theft, the defendant calls a witness to testify that he formerly knew the defendant as an army supply sergeant and that the defendant had turned down many opportunities for black marketeering.
Is the witness's testimony admissible?
Answer:
No. Should be no.
Explanation:
black marketeering has noting to do with prosecution because of theft.
BLACK MARKETEERING:
illegal traffic or trade in officially controlled commodities.
THEFT:
the physical removal of an object that is capable of being stolen without the consent of the owner and with the intention of depriving the owner of it permanently.
Black Marketeering pervention has nothing to do with stealing.
List the two pieces of legislation relevant to use
in the workplace
Answer:
the two pieces of legislation relevant to use
in the workplace are listed below:
●The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
●The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999.
The stiffening, or contraction, of the body after the vital functions cease is known as
cause of death.
rigor mortis.
postmortem lividity.
death.
Answer:
Rigor mortis- Stiffening or contraction of body muscles after vital functions cease.
Explanation:
What is the definition of rigor mortis?Rigor mortis is a postmortem condition that causes the body muscles to stiffen due to chemical alterations in their myofibrils. Rigor mortis is used to determine the period since death and whether the body was moved after death.
Three stages of Rigor mortis-0-8 hours: Body begins to harden but is still movable. 8-12 hours: Muscles become fully stiff. 12-24 hours: Muscles stay solid and stiff. 24-36 hours: Stiffness disperses, and muscles become flexible.Learn more about Rigor Mortis here-
https://brainly.com/question/25812860
#SPJ2
Samathahas a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a a warehouse. Each time that he took goods to the warehouse he was asked to sign an invoice which contained an exclusion clause stating that the warehouse owners were not liable for any damage to the goods. This invoice was put into effect inSeptember 2020, whereas thecontract had been agreedon July 2020. Oneday, Samatha came to take his clothes but realised that most of them were burneddue to a fire. As a result,he requiredthe warehouse owner to compenstate him and refuesedto pay for the storage. The warehouse owners brought action against him. Do the warehouse owners haveto be responsiblefor the loss?
Answer:
No
Explanation:
He Had Signed An Invoice Which Doesn't Hold The Warehouse Owners Responsible Even If They Did It.
define natural law and divine law
Answer:
Natural law is a term that refers to moral concepts that are universal throughout most, if not all, human civilizations. Divine law, on the other hand, is law that has been revealed to us by God. Though it may be globally obligatory, divine rule is not generally understood.
OAmalOHopeO
Answer:
One cannot discover divine law by natural reason alone; the precepts of divine law are disclosed only through divine revelation. The natural law is comprised of those precepts of the eternal law that govern the behavior of beings possessing reason and free will. ... But Aquinas is also a natural law legal theorist.
which option would best fit in this diagram in the bubble labeled 3? helppp plz
Answer:
letter d
Explanation:
state supreme court's
Answer:
The correct answe is A. U.S. district courts
Explanation
I just took the test
Samatha has a small business selling clothes. Because his shop is too small to store all his goods so he must hire a warehouse. Each time that he took goods to the warehouse he was asked to sign an invoice which contained an exclusion clause stating that the warehouse owners were not liable for any damage to the goods. This invoice was put into effect in September 2020, whereas the contract had been agreed on July 2020. One day, Samatha came to take his clothes but realised that most of them were burned due to a fire. As a result, he required the warehouse owner to compenstate him and refuesed to pay for the storage. The warehouse owners brought action against him.
Question Completion:
Do the warehouse owners have to be responsible for the loss?
Answer:
Samatha Vs Warehouse Owners
Legally, the warehouse owners are not liable for the loss. Through a series of previous dealings, the contract terms were restated or amended using the exclusion clause on the invoice, which Samatha signed.
Samatha should have been aware that exclusion clauses lessen contractual liabilities, and if he had continued to sign the invoices bearing the exclusion clause without objection, then he had consented to the exclusion.
Therefore, the warehouse owners are entitled to payment for warehouse storage, and Samatha has lost his right to claim compensation for the damage to his warehoused goods.
Explanation:
According to the Uniform Commercial Code, a series of previous conduct between Samatha and the Warehouse owners may create a common basis for understanding and interpreting the amendment of the underlying contract. For example, an exclusion clause can be introduced in the contract through previous dealings.
with reference to the company act in Kenya ,describe the capacity of a company to enter into a binding contract.
Answer:
To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner
