In Canada, just like in China, eating at McDonald’s was a novelty for us. In the wake of post-Mao economic reforms, the belated introduction of the Golden Arches to China represented a whole ethos about what constituted the good life. Fast food might connote easy accessibility or overindulgence in the West, but McDonald’s presented a different kind of comfort for my family and me. The cost of a burger was hardly a trivial thing for us at the time, and my parents didn’t actually treat me to meals there all that often. When they did, we always got takeout so we could eat our burgers and fries around our Formica dining table, on our own plates. The hope was to have our fast food as slowly as we could.

The Filet-O-Fish became my menu item of choice. Its virtues are too many to count; doing so would be futile. As McDonald’s only seafood-based option, the Filet-O-Fish’s semblance of relative health appealed to my parents. Luckily it was also McDonald’s most delicious item. It played to my Chinese palate: While other McDonald’s buns were toasted, the Filet-O-Fish’s was steamed, much like the baozi2. From its honeyed starch to its tangy tartar and savory fillet, the taste of the Filet-O-Fish carries an ineffable umami-ness. At once sweet and sour, it reminds me of orange-chicken sauce: a plausibly Chinese flavor mass-produced in America. Eating one always felt transportive — the equivalent of Proust’s madeleine3 for my Chinese diasporic upbringing.

The Filet-O-Fish is the gold standard of fast food for many Asian-Americans, as well as other minority American communities. Invented by an Ohio franchise owner in 1962, the first Filet-O-Fish was the answer to the problem of McDonald’s falling sales on Fridays, when observant Catholics abstained from eating meat. Born from an attempt to market fast food to as many people as possible, the tasty little unit has since been further claimed by everyone from fish-loving Chinese-Americans to practicing Muslims to — well, anyone with taste. By 1965 the sandwich had gone national.

Its appeal is inscrutable, perhaps out of proportion to its paltry constituent parts. Consider the recognizably flaky fish patty, made from the ubiquitous Alaskan pollock. “Pollock is everywhere,” writes the marine fisheries biologist Kevin M. Bailey in the book “Billion-Dollar Fish.” “It is the pure white meat in fish sticks bought at Walmart and Filet-O-Fish burgers ordered in McDonald’s.” But you wouldn’t want the fish to be more interesting. The generic quality of pollock’s fishiness — common enough for various cuisines to lay claim to it — is part of its allure. So maybe what makes the sandwich beloved isn’t its taste at all, but the juxtaposition of its elements: A single fillet of fried fish, topped with a thin slice of American cheese and tartar sauce, all of it cradled in a bun whose impossible roundness suggests the triumph of industrial food production.

As a child, I was under the fantasy that my obsession with such a strange sandwich was eccentric. When I went to McDonald’s with friends who got Chicken McNuggets Happy Meals or cheeseburgers, ordering the Filet-O-Fish made me feel as if I was in on some sort of secret. After a few years in Montreal, my dad landed a good government job in Victoria, British Columbia. On our drive across Canada, we indulged in the prospect of my dad’s earning a real salary by eating at McDonald’s almost daily, a whirlwind of Filet-O-Fish meals (for me) and hamburgers (for my parents). But my experience was shattered when I, fancying myself different, pointed out that my parents both loved hamburgers while I, a renegade, preferred the Filet-O-Fish. “Well, I like the Filet-O-Fish most too,” my mother put it candidly. “But it is expensive, so we only buy it for you.”

These days, the sandwich is more expensive than ever; it’s also less beautiful than I remember. At some point, the Filet-O-Fish underwent rebranding: An ostentatious paper box replaced the modest blue wrapper, while what I remember being a full slice of cheese seems to have shrank by half. McDonald’s insists that the cheese has always been half a slice — so as not to overwhelm the fishiness of the fillet. Today’s unboxing experience most often reveals limp cheese sagging off the patty, frequently stuck to the ill-advised box. Where is the madeleine of my youth? Nowadays, a good Filet-O-Fish is hard to find.
Which of the following statements best encapsulates the author’s line of reasoning in the passage?
A.“...McDonald’s presented a different kind of comfort for my family and me.” (paragraph 2)
B.“By 1965 the sandwich had gone national.” (paragraph 4)
C.“Its appeal is inscrutable, perhaps out of proportion to its paltry constituent parts.” (paragraph 5)
D.“These days, the sandwich is more expensive than ever; it’s also less beautiful than I remember.” (paragraph 7, sentence 1)
E.“Nowadays, a good Filet-O-Fish is hard to find.” (paragraph 7, sentence 6)

Answer:

Explanation:

It provides that the president can send the U.S. Armed Forces into action abroad only by declaration of war by Congress, "statutory authorization," or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

Answer:

What the answer choices

Answer:

Critics of vouchers contended they would damage public schools by skimming off the best students, or that such programs would benefit the more affluent families, who could supplement the vouchers to pay the tuition at the more expensive private schools. Hope this helps!

Explanation:

Answer:

B: Author bias

Explanation:

just took the quiz , mark me brainlest pls :)

Answer:

author bias

Explanation:

I took the test

Answer:

A D E

Explanation:

Answer:

A. They lived in Heian-kyo

D. They built the culture of Japan

E. They consisted of a few thousand people

Explanation:

The U.S. actions of sending troops to both Korea and Vietnam is known as the foreign policy approach called Intervention.

There are several ways to approach foreign policy such as:

Intervention works by a country getting directly involved in the affairs of another in order to influence a certain outcome. This usually happens militarily.

The U.S. used intervention in Korea and Vietnam to try to prevent Communism from taking over.

In conclusion, option A is correct.

Find out more about the U.S. intervention in Korea at https://brainly.com/question/1411002.

Answer: A intervention

Explanation: They sent troops to area

Answer:

The British rule demolished India through, taxation on anything made in India, and the exportation of raw materials, which caused a plentiful amount of famine,and throughout all of this, the British kept most on India uneducated, and those they did educate, most were forced to become interpreters for the benefits

Answer:

Most people, whether they are religious or not, will agree that the planet is special and deserving of our care and respect. Many religious people would go even further and say that the world is sacred, or holy, as it has been created by a God or a divine power, and that humans are responsible for ensuring it is looked after for future generations.

No. Atheists believe human life is valuable. Atheists don't do sacred.

Answer:

I think the Swedish and Dutch were the first!

Explanation:

Answer:

I hope it helps you this .

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Most Christians believe prayer deepens a person's faith. Praying can help the believer come to a greater understanding of God's purpose for their lives.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

"Prayer is one of the most important things a Christian can do. It is a time they are communicating with God and it should be taken very seriously. While there is deep theological meaning in prayer, it doesn't have to be something that is complicated and difficult. It's something anyone can do anywhere at any time." -some random website lol

Answer:

One way Africans responded to European slave traders is that a few West Africans refused to take part in the slave trade, but it was hard to resist the Europeans.

Second way is that other West Africans tried to find slaves outside their own nations.

Third way is that the people of West Africa had many different opinions about the slave trade with Europeans.

or

1. A few refused to trade

2. Some traded outside their community

3. Some traded own servants, prisoners

Explanation:

Answer:

1.phonograph

2.Steam machime

Explanation:

During that time, they had further knowledge to improve their inventions ..........

Answer:

The correct answer would be FALSE

Explanation:

false because it is not true

According to various medical and sociological research, the pros of abortion include "Low medical risk."

Abortion is the intentional removal of pregnancy such that it does not lead to the birthing of a child.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are various pros and cons of abortion.

Learn more about abortion here: https://brainly.com/question/16843838

Answer:

They're implied to be granted because similar powers have set a precedent

Explanation:

One of the ways that FDR persuaded African Americans and Black people

to vote for his political party His party supported equal rights for Black

people.

Franklin Roosevelt was successful in persuading the African Americans and

Black people to change their allegiance from Lincoln's republican party to

his Democratic party through the New Deal.

The new deal involved lots of reform programs which supported equal

rights for the people which was why they voted for him.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/14385060

Answer: his party supported equal rights for black people

Explanation:

just did the cst

Answer:

White Mississippians meant to limit the political power of Black people by denying them civil rights. On another, deeper level, these codes revealed an economic struggle between former masters and freed enslaved people. Ex-masters wanted to force Black people to work as they had during bondage.

Explanation:

Below are the events in World History in chronological order, with the earliest event having the value of 1 and the most recent having a value of 6.

Let's explore the years/period these events occurred in order to ascertain their chronological order.

Christopher Columbus discovered the new world in 1493. These opened up new lands and discovery of silver and other resources.

Mercantilism was known to be an economic system of trade that spanned beginning from the 16th century to the 18th century.

The industrial revolution was known to have began in 18th century precisely 1780s. It was this period that agricultural societies became more industrialised and urban.

The Mexican Revolution took place around 1910 to 1917 while that of the Russian Revolution began in 1917.

Neoliberalism came into force in the 1940s.

The Bretton Woods system, an international monetary system was during the United Nations Monetary and Financial conference in July 1944. It later led to the creation of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

Learn more about Mercantilism on https://brainly.com/question/909450

Answer:

A. Federal

Explanation:

Federal is the correct option. Have a great day.

Answer:

A Federal

Explanation:

I took the test on Edge :)

Answer:

That is why.

Explanation:

Here: The influx of Europeans, decimation of Indigenous, and explosion of the African slave trade is one way that it stayed the same from 1450-1750.

One of the situations that brought great positive changes for Japan was the appointment of Tokugawa leyasu as shogun and subsequent implementation of the Tokugawa shogunate.

Japan is the name of an island country located in eastern Asia made up of a total of 6,852 islands. The capital city of Japan is Tokyo.

One of the most prosperous moments in Japan was the appointment of Tokugawa Ieyasu as shogun who implemented the Tokugawa shogunate in Edo (present-day Tokyo). This period was characterized by the implementation of different measures that contributed to the success and unity of Japan such as:

As a result of Tokugawa protectionism, internal economic growth allowed advances such as:

Note: This question is incomplete. However I can answer it based on my prior knowledge.

Learn more about Japan in: https://brainly.com/question/10470209

Answer:

Killing of five colonists by British soldiers.

Answer: The killing of five colonists by British soldiers

Explanation:

New political media are forms of communication that facilitate the production, dissemination, and exchange of political content on platforms and within networks that accommodate interaction and collaboration. They have evolved rapidly over the past three decades, and continue to develop in novel, sometimes unanticipated ways. New media have wide-ranging implications for democratic governance and political practices. They have radically altered the ways in which government institutions operate and political leaders communicate. They have transformed the political media system, and redefined the role of journalists. They have redefined the way elections are contested, and how citizens engage in politics.

Carry On!

Stay safe!

Study hard Next time!

From Philippines here to help other students.

The fundamental difference in the way European and African cultures viewed slavery was that Europeans largely felt the pathway to prosperity was best achieved by creating new markets for slavery.

Slavery is the practice of slave holding. It is a situation in which the people are exploited. They are forbidden to quit their service.

Slavery played an important role in the economic development of Europe. Slavery provided the cheapest way to meet the demand for labor. Europe's position in the world, industrial revolution and colonial expansion were all fueled by slavery.

Thus, Option D right answer.

To learn more, slavery refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/1598239

#SPJ2

Answer:

5 causes

Explanation:

Stock Market Crash of 1929 - Many people assume, incorrectly, that the stock market crash that happened on October 29, 1929 is synonymous with the Great Depression. Indeed, it was one of the primary causes of the Great Depression. Within two months after the October catastrophe, investors had lost more than $40 billion. Even while the stock market started to recover some of its losses by the end of 1930, it was insufficient, and America entered what is now known as the Great Depression.

2. Bank Failures - Over 9,000 banks collapsed during the 1930s. Because bank deposits were uninsured, when banks collapsed, individuals simply lost their money. Uncertain of the economic situation and fearful for their own existence, surviving banks reduced their willingness to provide new loans. This aggravated the issue, resulting in decreasing spending.

3. Axed Purchasing Across the Board - As a result of the stock market fall and worries of more economic troubles, folks from all socioeconomic groups ceased purchasing. This resulted in a decrease in the amount of things produced and, therefore, a decrease in the workforce. As individuals lost employment, they were unable to pay for products purchased on installment plans and their property was seized. Inventory started to increase at a rapid rate. The unemployment rate increased to 25%, implying even less expenditure to help relieve the economic crisis.

4. American Economic Policy with Europe - In 1930, when firms started to collapse, the government enacted the Smoot-Hawley Tariff to aid in the protection of American enterprises. This imposed a hefty import tariff, resulting in decreased commerce between America and other nations, as well as some economic retribution.

5. Drought Conditions - While not a direct cause of the Great Depression, the drought in the Mississippi Valley in 1930 was severe enough that many farmers were unable to pay their taxes or other bills and were forced to sell their farms at a loss. The region was dubbed "The Dust Bowl." The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck dealt with this subject.